🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising group of states are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a proposal increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on strong data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the local level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional nations are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are less and less willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.