🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.